Withholding Tax (WHT) refers to a flat-rate income tax collected by the payer on certain types of income (including interest, royalties, dividends, and intangible services) earned in Poland by non-residents (and in the case of dividends, also by residents).
In 2019, a “revolution” in WHT regulations began, when a provision was introduced into the law stipulating that due diligence is required when verifying the conditions for applying a preference.
The lack of detailed explanations and regulations in this area has caused difficulties for payers in fulfilling this obligation.
The situation was further complicated by the introduction of the so-called “pay and refund” mechanism in 2022, which requires that when making payments for:
Increasing expectations from tax authorities regarding, among other things, due diligence related to collecting a very broad range of documentation, which must be:
causes many issues for Polish WHT payers.
There is also the issue of updating the documentation held by clients—once “collected,” documents do not automatically suffice for exemptions in subsequent years, as they must be regularly updated.
TLA continuously updates the “list” of documents required by tax authorities to ensure that Clients fulfill their documentation obligations with due diligence.
Currently, a highly “popular” topics (including in audits) are dividends, interest and royalties paid abroad and related issues, for example:
These are just a few of the areas in which TLA actively assists Clients.
Additionally, there are still technical issues related to submitting various applications and statements. TLA’s experience in this area helps save time and minimizes the risk of missing deadlines.
There is a noticeable trend of tax authorities conducting audits specifically focused on Withholding Tax (WHT).
As previously mentioned, tax authorities pay particular attention to dividends paid abroad and interest from cash pools.
The fact that tax authorities investigate issues such as board members of foreign companies crossing borders during the controlled period demonstrates how deeply they go to find grounds for denying the application of a given preference.